Lol: players find system terrible and bad because it wastes their time

Riot Games, Inc. is an American computer game programmer, publisher and also esports competition coordinator. Its head offices are in West Los Angeles, California. Founded in September 2006 by Brandon Beck as well as Marc Merrill to develop League of Legends, the company has gone on to develop a number of spin-off video games of Organization as well as an unconnected first-person shooter, Valorant. Considering that 2011, Riot has been a subsidiary of Chinese corporation Tencent. As a publisher, Riot Games supervises the manufacturing of League spin-offs by various other designers with its posting arm, Trouble Forge. The firm collaborated with Article to launch Arcane, a television collection based in the League of Legends cosmos. Trouble runs 14 worldwide Organization of Legends esports leagues, the League of Legends Globe Championship as well as the Valorant Champions Tour. The firm, which had 24 offices worldwide as of 2018, offers business sponsorships, merchandise, and also streaming rights for its organizations. Riot has encountered claims as well as lawsuits asserting a poisonous work environment society, consisting of sex discrimination and also sexual harassment. The company was slammed for its use forced arbitration in feedback to these allegations.

Beleaguer of Legends players still have a problem with how Riot Games regulates the situation when a teammate is long AFK at the beginning of a match or even leaves the match. Although there has been an option for a remake option since 2016, but the feeling many players as annoying because so nonsensical games are created in Lol, which draw over for a long time.

What is the problem?

In normal matches and ranked matches from LOL, it always happens, the player is already very early, in the first few minutes of a match, either AFK or can not participate in the match due to connection problems. In such a case, the LOL match for the team with the missing player is already lost and many feeling as meaningless to play even further, if one is in the detriment. While there is a way to cancel a game in such a situation early, but the remake system will be insufficient.

Voting must be initiated manually — time windows are short

How does the system work? Due to the Remake function, it has been possible since 2016 to start a vote from Minute 3 to decide that the game is aborted:

The team has 60 seconds to enter the chat Remake if a player is either inactive or when the connection is disconnected — then a tuning starts. At the vote, players have 30 seconds to vote yes or no. If only 4 people are in a team, 2 must be right with yes. Are only 3 in a team, a yes voice is enough. A remake counts neither as a victory nor defeat. But the inactive player is punished.

This is the criticism of the system : On Reddit, a player has now pronounced against the system. He says: In such a case, if one or more players are missing, a vote is simply unnecessary — in the event that such an early falls, matches should always be new.

Because the vote is difficult, often missing someone who is in play with friends (a premade group ): The friends wanted to protect him and would therefore vote with no.

Or the time window for the chat command / remake or the voting itself ran so fast that they are not all heard and therefore the remake does not come.

If the match is running then, the team would increase the situation, sure to extractor, and expand and enjoy a completely futile match up to 50 minutes.

The thread creator says the system is a terrible mechanics that was extremely poorly implemented.

Overwatch is called as a model

This is the discussion : In fact, many see the like the thread creator. The thread has over 470 comments and more than 5,800 up votes.

They, too, are dissatisfied with the choice option at remake. Especially because the whole mechanism hangs on the fact that you see the message in chat and then urgently has to initiate the process to miss him.

People want, if there is already a vote that they automatically pop up and a single voice is enough to end the vote.

A user says:

If you are a premade group of 5 people and know that the AFK player comes back, and it's okay for them, then let them play in the lower room. But as soon as a single does not want to play the next 15-30 minutes 4 against 5, the game should be stopped because no one has earned to make something in a video game.

As a positive example, Overwatch is called: if there leaves the match in the first minute, it simply closes — and there is no way to stop.

Lol is one of the most successful video games and had a strong year 2021. This can also be seen in the criticism that appeals to individual details, while in other games there are often big problems with the whole game, the criticism of Lol actually rotates very specific decisions and supposed little things:

LOL: Players criticize new skin that is based on Arcane, as a dangerous precedent